header-logo header-logo

​Car crash consultation?

27 January 2017 / Nicholas Bevan
Issue: 7731 / Categories: Features , Insurance surgery , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail
nlj_7731_bevan

Nicholas Bevan takes a critical look at the government’s consultation on third party motor insurance

  • The Department for Transport responds to European ruling in Vnuk from 2014.
  • Different options considered for correcting longstanding infringements.
  • No review of the wider long-standing infringements of EU law.
  • Deadline for responses expires on 31 March 2017.

The Department for Transport (DfT) has published a 61-page technical consultation paper on bringing UK law closer into line with the European Motor Insurance Directive 2009/103/EC (the directive). This is the government’s belated first step in response to the Court of Justice of the European Union’s (CJEU) ruling in Damijan Vnuk v Zavarovalnica Triglav d.d. C-162/13, [2014] All ER (D) 121 (Sep) more than two years ago.

Vnuk refresher

Vnuk reaffirmed the strict and absolute nature of the third party motor insurance requirement prescribed by Art 3 of the directive. This contrasts sharply with the qualified and contingent nature of compulsory third party insurance under Pt VI of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (the 1988 Act)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll