header-logo header-logo

​Car crash consultation?

27 January 2017 / Nicholas Bevan
Issue: 7731 / Categories: Features , Insurance surgery , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail
nlj_7731_bevan

Nicholas Bevan takes a critical look at the government’s consultation on third party motor insurance

  • The Department for Transport responds to European ruling in Vnuk from 2014.
  • Different options considered for correcting longstanding infringements.
  • No review of the wider long-standing infringements of EU law.
  • Deadline for responses expires on 31 March 2017.

The Department for Transport (DfT) has published a 61-page technical consultation paper on bringing UK law closer into line with the European Motor Insurance Directive 2009/103/EC (the directive). This is the government’s belated first step in response to the Court of Justice of the European Union’s (CJEU) ruling in Damijan Vnuk v Zavarovalnica Triglav d.d. C-162/13, [2014] All ER (D) 121 (Sep) more than two years ago.

Vnuk refresher

Vnuk reaffirmed the strict and absolute nature of the third party motor insurance requirement prescribed by Art 3 of the directive. This contrasts sharply with the qualified and contingent nature of compulsory third party insurance under Pt VI of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (the 1988 Act)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Commercial disputes practice bolstered by partner hire

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

London competition team expands with collective actions specialist hire

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Commercial dispute resolution team in London welcomes partner

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll