header-logo header-logo

01 March 2013
Issue: 7550 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Care proceedings

Re J (children) (care proceedings: past ‘possible perpetrators’ in new family unit) [2013] UKSC 9, [2013] All ER (D) 232 (Feb)

A real possibility that a parent had harmed a child in the past was not, by itself, sufficient to establish the likelihood that that parent would cause harm to another child in the future. The findings of harm caused in the past might be relied on only to the extent that they might be relevant to the issue the court had to decide. A prediction of future harm based on what had happened in the past would only be justified if one could link what had happened in the past directly and unequivocally with the person and the new family unit in whose care the subsequent child was living or would live. Where the person who harmed a child could not be identified, the threshold could not be met in relation to another child solely on the basis that a possible perpetrator of the harm was involved in the care of that child unless all possible

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Kevin Joynes & Neil Gosling

Clarke Willmott—Kevin Joynes & Neil Gosling

Clarke Willmott bolsters housebuilder expertise in Birmingham

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Firm adds former Simmons Simmons patent head to engineering and tech team

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

Freeths strengthens its voice in national disputes with ACTAPS committee appointment

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll