header-logo header-logo

Carry on screening

25 October 2007 / Nicholas Hancox
Issue: 7294 / Categories: Opinion , Local government , Media , Environment
printer mail-detail

The government should have done its homework before bombarding schools with An Inconvenient Truth, says Nicholas Hancox

When the government decided to distribute Al Gore’s partisan film on climate change, An Inconvenient Truth, wholesale and free of charge to every secondary school in England, its civil servant advisers must surely have mentioned their own inconvenient truth; that biased political propaganda is illegal in maintained schools. 

Why would politicians decide to distribute a DVD to thousands of schools, if they did not want to influence the opinions of the pupils who would watch it? Their objective must have been political; they must have wanted the film to change the opinions of the pupils—not about the science of climate change, but about the desired political response to the science of climate change.
Sections 406 and 407 of the Education Act 1996 (EA 1996) were first enacted during Margaret Thatcher’s premiership in 1986. Section 406 bans political indoctrination in maintained schools. Section 407 requires a balanced treatment of all political issues in those same maintained schools.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll