header-logo header-logo

The case of the missing mandate

08 September 2017 / David Wolchover
Categories: Features , Brexit , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
nlj_7752_davies_1

David Wolchover contends that there is no mandate for the UK to be taken out of the EU & considers how the European Parliament may force a further referendum

Early in June Counsel Magazine online published an article in which I contended that the Prime Minister’s 29 March 2017 letter to President of the Council of Europe Donald Tusk did not, despite its claim, actually trigger Art 50 of the Treaty on European Union (“Article 50: the trigger that never was?”). My argument was and remains that no decision or equivalent declaration of intention has ever been made by the UK to leave the EU and the government enjoys no mandate to embark upon the journey to withdrawal.

Having further contemplated the issue I have formulated a further argument which arguably makes the case against the existence of a mandate for invoking Art 50 incontrovertible. The purpose of this article is to highlight that new argument, which is likely to provide the basis for discreet steps to be taken

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll