header-logo header-logo

The case for a referendum re-run

18 January 2019 / David Wolchover
Categories: Features , Brexit
printer mail-detail

How close is Plan B for a People's Vote? David Wolchover reports

In the face of the anticipated defeat of the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill, a second referendum was increasingly being touted as the government’s lifeboat. Indeed, it might have been supposed that they were already preparing to clamber aboard, if any credence attached to reports that Downing Street and Conservative Central Office were working on contingency plans for a poll (see eg, Tim Shipman,Theresa May’s team plots new EU referendum,’ The Times, 16 December 2018).

But a new study led by Professor Tim Bale of Queen Mary College and funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) suggests that the government may now be under considerable Conservative constituency party pressure to continue to reject a referendum and to opt instead for a no-deal exit if or when the withdrawal agreement is rejected following the Commons ‘meaningful vote’ debate due to start on or about 9 January (see Rajeev Syal, ‘Brexit: most Tory

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Nigel Adams & Rehman Noormohamed

Weightmans—Nigel Adams & Rehman Noormohamed

Insurance and corporate teams in London announce double partner hire

Fieldfisher—Chris Cartmell

Fieldfisher—Chris Cartmell

Technology and data practice bolstered by partner hire

South Square—Tony Beswetherick KC

South Square—Tony Beswetherick KC

Set strengthens civil fraud and insolvency offering with new member

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
Delays at HM Land Registry are no longer a background irritation but a growing source of professional risk. Writing in NLJ this week, Phil Murrin of DAC Beachcroft explores how the ‘registration gap’—now stretching up to two years in complex cases—is fuelling client frustration, priority disputes, and negligence claims
back-to-top-scroll