header-logo header-logo

The case for a referendum re-run

18 January 2019 / David Wolchover
Categories: Features , Brexit
printer mail-detail

How close is Plan B for a People's Vote? David Wolchover reports

In the face of the anticipated defeat of the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill, a second referendum was increasingly being touted as the government’s lifeboat. Indeed, it might have been supposed that they were already preparing to clamber aboard, if any credence attached to reports that Downing Street and Conservative Central Office were working on contingency plans for a poll (see eg, Tim Shipman,Theresa May’s team plots new EU referendum,’ The Times, 16 December 2018).

But a new study led by Professor Tim Bale of Queen Mary College and funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) suggests that the government may now be under considerable Conservative constituency party pressure to continue to reject a referendum and to opt instead for a no-deal exit if or when the withdrawal agreement is rejected following the Commons ‘meaningful vote’ debate due to start on or about 9 January (see Rajeev Syal, ‘Brexit: most Tory

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

Manchester’s online LLM has accelerated career progression for its graduates

mfg Solicitors—Philip Chapman

mfg Solicitors—Philip Chapman

Regional firm strengthens corporate team with partner hire

Switalskis—Sally Christey, Mathew Abiagom & Cyman Kaur

Switalskis—Sally Christey, Mathew Abiagom & Cyman Kaur

Commercial property team expands with trio of appointments

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll