header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

CaseLines: time to take a second look?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
12 January 2018 / David Jackson , Paul Sachs , Paul Sachs
Issue: 7776 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7776_caselines

Since we last wrote for NLJ in 2012, online courts, case management & CaseLines have moved on...

‘Since we last wrote for NLJ in 2012, online courts, case management & CaseLines have moved on. We have increased our market share, our areas of excellence & our impact on digital litigation. Paperless courts are happening now and our latest innovations, outlined below, focus on the needs of trial lawyers and address the challenges of de-duplication & court presentation, critical for success in a paperless environment.’

—David Jackson & Paul Sachs, Directors, Netmaster Solutions Ltd, which provides CaseLines—a global leader in digital litigation

AI, deduplication & evidence bundles

Continuing to break new ground in digital evidence management, CaseLines is now promoting the first fruits of its new artificial intelligence research programme. Lawyers can now use CaseLines to automatically detect duplicate documents in an evidence bundle, saving up to 95% of the effort needed to remove duplicates.

As lawyers with experience in civil or family litigation know well,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Set creates new client and business development role amid growth

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlie Hancock

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlie Hancock

Private wealth and tax offering bolstered by partner hire

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Firm grows real estate team with tenth partner hire this financial year

NEWS
Read All
Who’s on the 2026 silk list?
The rank of King’s Counsel (KC) has been awarded to 96 barristers, and no solicitors, in the latest silk round
NLJ this week: Police, contempt and the rule of law
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
NLJ this week: When your brain signs the contract
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
NLJ this week: Comparators—how close is close enough?
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
NLJ this week: Domicile—more than where you live
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll