header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
12 January 2018 / David Jackson , Paul Sachs , Paul Sachs
Issue: 7776 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

CaseLines: time to take a second look?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7776_caselines

Since we last wrote for NLJ in 2012, online courts, case management & CaseLines have moved on...

‘Since we last wrote for NLJ in 2012, online courts, case management & CaseLines have moved on. We have increased our market share, our areas of excellence & our impact on digital litigation. Paperless courts are happening now and our latest innovations, outlined below, focus on the needs of trial lawyers and address the challenges of de-duplication & court presentation, critical for success in a paperless environment.’

—David Jackson & Paul Sachs, Directors, Netmaster Solutions Ltd, which provides CaseLines—a global leader in digital litigation

AI, deduplication & evidence bundles

Continuing to break new ground in digital evidence management, CaseLines is now promoting the first fruits of its new artificial intelligence research programme. Lawyers can now use CaseLines to automatically detect duplicate documents in an evidence bundle, saving up to 95% of the effort needed to remove duplicates.

As lawyers with experience in civil or family litigation know well,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Policing the safeguards when appointing trust corporations
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
NLJ this week: What the court considers when assessing refusal of ADR
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
NLJ this week: Finding innovative ways to fund the justice gap
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Two’s company, but three’s a crowd in financial provision cases
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
Charities Appeals Supplement: March 2026
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll