header-logo header-logo

Cases backlog fuels remand crisis

18 January 2023
Issue: 8009 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail
Some 770 defendants have been incarcerated for more than two years awaiting trial, as the justice system buckles under the pressure of ever-increasing numbers of prisoners on remand.

In a report published last week, the Justice Committee warned the number of prisoners on remand is at its highest in 50 years. Moreover, the prisoners are being held for longer periods of time, often beyond the statutory six-month limit. Those found not guilty at trial are not entitled to any support on release.

The committee said the backlog of cases in the courts is a major factor, but identified other factors too, including the lack of community provision for homelessness, mental illness and drug abuse. Another reason is that custodial remand is increasingly used for non-violent offences—female defendants are often held on remand despite posing a low risk to the community and for crimes that do not carry a custodial sentence.

The Justice Committee called for an independent review into the application of the Bail Act 1976, and of the legal framework for custody time limits. Moreover, greater use of alternatives such as conditional bail and electronic tagging would ease the burden, it said.

The committee called for remand prisoners to be given the same access to mental health services, drug treatment, education, training, discharge grant and support on release as the rest of the prison population.

Sir Bob Neill, chair of the Justice Committee, said custodial remand was ‘too often’ being used ‘as an easy option in cases of low-level repeat offending or social problems with little thought for the lasting consequences this can have on the individual’.

Law Society president Lubna Shuja said: ‘We echo the committee’s concerns.

‘Solicitors repeatedly tell us about the difficulty of seeing clients in custody and there is a real danger of people not getting proper access to justice.’

Issue: 8009 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll