header-logo header-logo

Caste: invisible discrimination?

09 March 2007 / Annapurna Waughray
Issue: 7263 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Caste-based discrimination is a reality in the UK. Annapurna Waughray investigates

Caste discrimination is a new concept to most UK lawyers although English courts, including the Privy Council, have faced questions relating to this issue—particularly in family and immigration cases—for many years (see R v Sabharwal [1973] WL 40695; Suntharalingham v Inspector of Police, Kankesanturai [1972] AC 370, [1973] 3 WLR 896).

Caste-based discrimination affects some 270m people worldwide. Although commonly associated with south Asia, caste-type systems and discrimination on the basis of caste status exist throughout the world; a high proportion of reported UK Immigration Appeal Tribunal cases concerning ‘risk of return’ on grounds of caste relate to Somalia or the Yemen.

Moreover, caste discrimination has been exported to diaspora communities where, for many, caste has been a long-term, if hidden, reality. A report, No Escape: Caste Discrimination in the UK published in July 2006 by the Dalit Solidarity Network UK (DSN), a London-based non-governmental organisation, documents the extent of discrimination on grounds of caste among the south Asian community in the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll