header-logo header-logo

Caste: invisible discrimination?

09 March 2007 / Annapurna Waughray
Issue: 7263 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Caste-based discrimination is a reality in the UK. Annapurna Waughray investigates

Caste discrimination is a new concept to most UK lawyers although English courts, including the Privy Council, have faced questions relating to this issue—particularly in family and immigration cases—for many years (see R v Sabharwal [1973] WL 40695; Suntharalingham v Inspector of Police, Kankesanturai [1972] AC 370, [1973] 3 WLR 896).

Caste-based discrimination affects some 270m people worldwide. Although commonly associated with south Asia, caste-type systems and discrimination on the basis of caste status exist throughout the world; a high proportion of reported UK Immigration Appeal Tribunal cases concerning ‘risk of return’ on grounds of caste relate to Somalia or the Yemen.

Moreover, caste discrimination has been exported to diaspora communities where, for many, caste has been a long-term, if hidden, reality. A report, No Escape: Caste Discrimination in the UK published in July 2006 by the Dalit Solidarity Network UK (DSN), a London-based non-governmental organisation, documents the extent of discrimination on grounds of caste among the south Asian community in the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll