header-logo header-logo

02 September 2010
Issue: 7431 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Catholic adoption charity loses appeal over gay parents

A Catholic adoption agency has lost its appeal to the Charity Commission over its policy of excluding gay couples.

The Commission said last week it is withholding consent to the charity Catholic Care to amend its charitable objects to discriminate against prospective adopters if they are in a same-sex relationship.

The decision follows a high court judgment in March, which found the essentially public nature of adoption services meant respect for religious views could not be a justification for discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation. However, the court allowed the charity to appeal against the Commission’s decision and set out principles by which the Commission should consider Catholic Care’s case. These principles included the need to justify the discrimination within Art 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights, under which there needs to be “particularly convincing and weighty reasons” to justify any discrimination.

Catholic Care, which has been providing adoption services for more than 100 years, had argued that it would lose its funding from the Roman Catholic Church if it did not discriminate.

However, the Commission concluded that the evidence did not provide sufficiently “convincing and weighty reasons” to justify the charity’s discrimination. This was because:

• it is in the interests of the children involved that the pool from which prospective parents are drawn be as wide as possible;
• discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation is a serious matter because it departs from the principle of treating people equally;
• local authority evidence suggested that even if the charity were to close its adoption service, children would be placed through other channels; and
• local authority evidence suggested that gay and lesbian people were suitable prospective parents for hard to place children, and that such adoptions have been successful.

Andrew Hind, the Commission’s chief executive, says: “Clearly the interests of children are paramount.
“In certain circumstances, it is not against the law for charities to discriminate on the grounds of sexual orientation. However, because the prohibition on such discrimination is a fundamental principle of human rights law, such discrimination can only be permitted in the most compelling circumstances.”

A spokesperson for Catholic Care says: “The charity is very disappointed with the outcome.

“Catholic Care will now consider whether there is any other way in which the charity can continue to support families seeking to adopt children in need.
“In any event, Catholic Care will seek to register as an adoption support agency offering a service to those who were adopted in the past and are now seeking information about their background, and also to support adoptive parents already approved by Catholic Care.”
 

Issue: 7431 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll