header-logo header-logo

Catholic adoption charity loses appeal over gay parents

02 September 2010
Issue: 7431 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

A Catholic adoption agency has lost its appeal to the Charity Commission over its policy of excluding gay couples.

The Commission said last week it is withholding consent to the charity Catholic Care to amend its charitable objects to discriminate against prospective adopters if they are in a same-sex relationship.

The decision follows a high court judgment in March, which found the essentially public nature of adoption services meant respect for religious views could not be a justification for discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation. However, the court allowed the charity to appeal against the Commission’s decision and set out principles by which the Commission should consider Catholic Care’s case. These principles included the need to justify the discrimination within Art 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights, under which there needs to be “particularly convincing and weighty reasons” to justify any discrimination.

Catholic Care, which has been providing adoption services for more than 100 years, had argued that it would lose its funding from the Roman Catholic Church if it did not discriminate.

However, the Commission concluded that the evidence did not provide sufficiently “convincing and weighty reasons” to justify the charity’s discrimination. This was because:

• it is in the interests of the children involved that the pool from which prospective parents are drawn be as wide as possible;
• discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation is a serious matter because it departs from the principle of treating people equally;
• local authority evidence suggested that even if the charity were to close its adoption service, children would be placed through other channels; and
• local authority evidence suggested that gay and lesbian people were suitable prospective parents for hard to place children, and that such adoptions have been successful.

Andrew Hind, the Commission’s chief executive, says: “Clearly the interests of children are paramount.
“In certain circumstances, it is not against the law for charities to discriminate on the grounds of sexual orientation. However, because the prohibition on such discrimination is a fundamental principle of human rights law, such discrimination can only be permitted in the most compelling circumstances.”

A spokesperson for Catholic Care says: “The charity is very disappointed with the outcome.

“Catholic Care will now consider whether there is any other way in which the charity can continue to support families seeking to adopt children in need.
“In any event, Catholic Care will seek to register as an adoption support agency offering a service to those who were adopted in the past and are now seeking information about their background, and also to support adoptive parents already approved by Catholic Care.”
 

Issue: 7431 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Paul Madden

Gilson Gray—Paul Madden

Partner appointed to head international insolvency and dispute resolution for England

Brachers—Gill Turner Tucker

Brachers—Gill Turner Tucker

Kent firm expands regional footprint through strategic acquisition

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—William Charles

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—William Charles

Financial disputes and investigations specialist joins as partner in London

NEWS
Ministers’ proposals to raise funds by seizing interest on lawyers’ client account schemes could ‘cause firms to close’, solicitors have warned
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll