header-logo header-logo

02 June 2017 / Giles Eyre , Linda Monaci
Issue: 7748 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Causation: an expert’s guide

nlj_7748_monaci

Giles Eyre & Dr Linda Monaci discuss the challenges of completing complex medico-legal reports

  • Clinical experts must be aware of the applicable legal principles in their medico-legal practice and must apply them in providing opinion.
  • Lawyers must direct experts in their instructions.
  • A neuropsychological case study.

For medical experts one of the most difficult areas to address, and to communicate, in civil claims is that of causation. For lawyers too medical causation is difficult—it is frequently difficult to discern where the medical expert stands in terms of the applicable legal tests. Particular difficulty is experienced where there is a pre-existing condition impacting on deficits caused by the index event.

Experts must be fully aware of the legal principles and be able to apply them when writing reports so that their opinions are meaningful to the lawyers and the court in determining the value of a claim, while lawyers must be able to guide the expert to provide useful opinion on causation.

This article illustrates appropriate application of the legal principles

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll