header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Causation: an expert’s guide

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
02 June 2017 / Giles Eyre , Linda Monaci
Issue: 7748 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7748_monaci

Giles Eyre & Dr Linda Monaci discuss the challenges of completing complex medico-legal reports
  • Clinical experts must be aware of the applicable legal principles in their medico-legal practice and must apply them in providing opinion.
  • Lawyers must direct experts in their instructions.
  • A neuropsychological case study.

For medical experts one of the most difficult areas to address, and to communicate, in civil claims is that of causation. For lawyers too medical causation is difficult—it is frequently difficult to discern where the medical expert stands in terms of the applicable legal tests. Particular difficulty is experienced where there is a pre-existing condition impacting on deficits caused by the index event.

Experts must be fully aware of the legal principles and be able to apply them when writing reports so that their opinions are meaningful to the lawyers and the court in determining the value of a claim, while lawyers must be able to guide the expert to provide useful opinion on causation.

This article illustrates appropriate application of the legal principles

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Small firms call for tech clarity as AI looms
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Traders’ convictions quashed in Libor shock
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
NLJ this week: Fraud claims climb as courts brace for AI threats
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
NLJ this week: Pro bono power without the red tape
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Trans pool player loses discrimination fight
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll