header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
02 June 2017 / Giles Eyre , Linda Monaci
Issue: 7748 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Causation: an expert’s guide

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7748_monaci

Giles Eyre & Dr Linda Monaci discuss the challenges of completing complex medico-legal reports
  • Clinical experts must be aware of the applicable legal principles in their medico-legal practice and must apply them in providing opinion.
  • Lawyers must direct experts in their instructions.
  • A neuropsychological case study.

For medical experts one of the most difficult areas to address, and to communicate, in civil claims is that of causation. For lawyers too medical causation is difficult—it is frequently difficult to discern where the medical expert stands in terms of the applicable legal tests. Particular difficulty is experienced where there is a pre-existing condition impacting on deficits caused by the index event.

Experts must be fully aware of the legal principles and be able to apply them when writing reports so that their opinions are meaningful to the lawyers and the court in determining the value of a claim, while lawyers must be able to guide the expert to provide useful opinion on causation.

This article illustrates appropriate application of the legal principles

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026—the winners!
The winners of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026 have now been announced, marking another outstanding celebration of excellence, innovation, and impact across the legal profession
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll