header-logo header-logo

Caution on cameras

28 November 2012
Issue: 7540 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Warning over "slippery slope effect"

Peers and MPs have warned of the “slippery slope effect” if cameras are allowed in court.

The Joint Committee on Human Rights has published its report into the Crime and Courts Bill, currently at Report stage in the House of Lords. It warns that defendants may not be protected and that victims and witnesses may be deterred from the judicial process because the Bill is too “broad”.

It recommends the government conduct a more comprehensive public consultation, carry out a more detailed impact assessment and review its policy after a few years, and wants filming to be restricted to appellate proceedings in the meantime.

The committee says that, while the government intends to restrict filming to the Court of Appeal initially, the Bill allows for the possibility of this being extended at a later stage.

Dr Hywel Francis MP, chair of the committee, says: “We agree that justice must be transparent and publicly accessible.

“But the power in the Bill is too broad…as currently drafted, it could too easily be extended to include filming of witnesses, parties, crime victims, jurors and defendants—a very different proposition, which could have the unintended consequence of deterring victims and witnesses, and possibly even undermining the fairness of trials. It’s potentially a slippery slope.”

Issue: 7540 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll