header-logo header-logo

28 November 2012
Issue: 7540 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Caution on cameras

Warning over "slippery slope effect"

Peers and MPs have warned of the “slippery slope effect” if cameras are allowed in court.

The Joint Committee on Human Rights has published its report into the Crime and Courts Bill, currently at Report stage in the House of Lords. It warns that defendants may not be protected and that victims and witnesses may be deterred from the judicial process because the Bill is too “broad”.

It recommends the government conduct a more comprehensive public consultation, carry out a more detailed impact assessment and review its policy after a few years, and wants filming to be restricted to appellate proceedings in the meantime.

The committee says that, while the government intends to restrict filming to the Court of Appeal initially, the Bill allows for the possibility of this being extended at a later stage.

Dr Hywel Francis MP, chair of the committee, says: “We agree that justice must be transparent and publicly accessible.

“But the power in the Bill is too broad…as currently drafted, it could too easily be extended to include filming of witnesses, parties, crime victims, jurors and defendants—a very different proposition, which could have the unintended consequence of deterring victims and witnesses, and possibly even undermining the fairness of trials. It’s potentially a slippery slope.”

Issue: 7540 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll