header-logo header-logo

Caution on cameras

28 November 2012
Issue: 7540 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Warning over "slippery slope effect"

Peers and MPs have warned of the “slippery slope effect” if cameras are allowed in court.

The Joint Committee on Human Rights has published its report into the Crime and Courts Bill, currently at Report stage in the House of Lords. It warns that defendants may not be protected and that victims and witnesses may be deterred from the judicial process because the Bill is too “broad”.

It recommends the government conduct a more comprehensive public consultation, carry out a more detailed impact assessment and review its policy after a few years, and wants filming to be restricted to appellate proceedings in the meantime.

The committee says that, while the government intends to restrict filming to the Court of Appeal initially, the Bill allows for the possibility of this being extended at a later stage.

Dr Hywel Francis MP, chair of the committee, says: “We agree that justice must be transparent and publicly accessible.

“But the power in the Bill is too broad…as currently drafted, it could too easily be extended to include filming of witnesses, parties, crime victims, jurors and defendants—a very different proposition, which could have the unintended consequence of deterring victims and witnesses, and possibly even undermining the fairness of trials. It’s potentially a slippery slope.”

Issue: 7540 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll