header-logo header-logo

CBA strike suspended… for now

11 October 2022
Issue: 7998 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail
Criminal law barristers have voted to suspend their strike action, following a revised offer from the justice secretary, but warned the dispute would not be resolved until the offer was implemented.

The ballot result was 57% in favour of suspension against almost 43% for continuing the strike (1,488 voted yes to suspending the action while 1,117 voted no, out of 2,605 votes cast).

Justice secretary Brandon Lewis offered an extra £54m, raising fees by 15% for the ‘vast majority’ of cases currently before or due to come before the Crown Court. Under the previous offer, the 15% rise would only apply to cases starting on or after 1 October.

Announcing the ballot results, Criminal Bar Association (CBA) chair Kirsty Brimelow KC (pictured) and CBA executive members said: ‘Barristers should not have to fight so hard again to bring this responsibility back home to government.

‘The offer from the government is an overdue start. Its acceptance by barristers is on the basis that it is implemented.

‘Otherwise, the CBA will ballot again to lift the suspension of action… our members remain ready to act again.’

The CBA said it would now focus on setting up the criminal legal aid advisory board.

Mark Fenhalls KC, chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘The offer was the culmination of many months of work and pressure, and unprecedented personal sacrifice by barristers.’

However, Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘The justice minister may think he has got one problem off his table but there are bigger problems coming his way as this dispute continues.

‘This is another example of a government U-turn making a bad situation worse’. She warned solicitors would see the government had found ‘a magic money tree to stop the disruptive action of barristers—money that was not available to pay solicitors fairly.’

Boyce called for parity on the 15% fee increase—solicitors’ fees are increasing by just 9%.

Boyce said: ‘If the gap isn’t bridged by the time the government publishes their full response to the independent review in November, we have made it clear we will advise our members that there is no viable future in criminal legal aid work.’

Issue: 7998 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Pensions firm welcomes legal director in London

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Real estate disputes team strengthened by London partner hire

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Litigation partner joins disputes team in London

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll