header-logo header-logo

Chancellor fails to reassure sceptics

18 October 2007
Issue: 7293 / Categories: Legal News , Banking , Competition
printer mail-detail

News

A more “certain and protectionist” banking system is needed to minimise the chances of another Northern Rock fiasco, lawyers claim.
The comments follow the government’s decision to increase guaranteed bank saving deposits from £2,000 to £35,000.

Tom Morrison of Rollits Solicitors says it will take more than “calming words” from the chancellor to reassure sceptics.
“While the horse may have bolted somewhat for Northern Rock, there is a need for a more certain and protectionist scheme to be put in place to minimise the chances of a bank run happening on that scale again,” he says. “The scheme needs to be set in stone to communicate with the public in unequivocal terms and must guarantee the savings of the majority using a clear andswift mechanism.”

Meanwhile, the Association of British Insurers (ABI) wants the government to ensure that the fully guaranteed limit remains at £35,000 and to focus on enabling faster payouts from the Financial Services Compensation Scheme in the event of bank failure.

The ABI’s director general, Stephen Haddrill, says the government should not risk distorting the savings market by attempting to protect bank deposits when there are more aspects to consider. He adds that the new limit of £35,000 introduced will protect 98% of savers.

Issue: 7293 / Categories: Legal News , Banking , Competition
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll