header-logo header-logo

A change in attitude

23 October 2008
Issue: 7342 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Adhering to good practice can reduce hostility in family law proceedings, says Lorraine Jones

Over the past decade there has been a shift in attitudes in family law proceedings. The dynamics are now centred more on negotiation and settlement between the parties, rather than hostile litigation. A handful of the methods employed in trying to ensure good practice in matrimonial matters are discussed below.
Professional conduct

All solicitors are required to abide by the Law Society's Professional Code of Conduct in particular at Code 1 and 2 which, among other matters, asks that we provide clients with a clear explanation of the issues involved and the options available.
Family law protocol

The second edition of the family law protocol provides helpful guidance to practitioners. The pre-action protocol for ancillary relief states that its aim is to ensure disclosure and negotiation is dealt with both cost effectively and in line with the overriding objective of the Family Proceedings (Amendments) Rules 1999.

The protocol emphasises the need to try and resolve matters fairly and promptly rather than by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Moore Barlow—Jess Ready & Natasha Jones

Moore Barlow—Jess Ready & Natasha Jones

Commercial property and corporate teams expand in Southampton

Watershed—Rob Elliott

Watershed—Rob Elliott

Employment firm expands capability with experienced hire

Devonshires—Aoife Murphy & Mandeep Sahota

Devonshires—Aoife Murphy & Mandeep Sahota

Housing management and property litigation team bolstered by partner hires

NEWS
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
Delays at HM Land Registry are no longer a background irritation but a growing source of professional risk. Writing in NLJ this week, Phil Murrin of DAC Beachcroft explores how the ‘registration gap’—now stretching up to two years in complex cases—is fuelling client frustration, priority disputes, and negligence claims
back-to-top-scroll