header-logo header-logo

Charles Russell Speechlys—Amira Shaker-Bortman

18 April 2024
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Firm boosts international private wealth offering with new partner

Charles Russell Speechlys has welcomed Amira Shaker-Bortman as a partner in its private client team. Amira is based in the firm’s London office and joins Charles Russell Speechlys from McDermott Will & Emery.

Amira has over 15 years’ experience acting for ultra-high net worth individuals, family offices and respective investment holding companies on corporate transactional and advisory matters. Her primary area of focus is advising on complex, cross-border investment structuring and wealth management, as well as acting for clients on the acquisition of high-value assets and financial instruments in Europe, the US and the Middle East.

Most of Amira’s clients are based in the Middle East, where she acts for ruling family PEPs and their corporate structures. At Charles Russell Speechlys, she will be instrumental in expanding the reach of the firm’s international private client offering in the Middle East and beyond.

Amira said of her appointment: ‘Charles Russell Speechlys’ presence and commitment to providing world-class private client and private wealth legal services in the Middle East is hugely attractive to the clients I look after and to me personally. In turn, my Middle East private wealth experience is a complementary addition to the firm’s private client capabilities.

‘I am particularly keen to be an interface between offices and divisions to broaden the firm’s reach in the UAE and wider AGCC region. I also look forward to contributing to and building on the firm’s client base of high-net worth individuals, particularly prominent female investors in the Middle East.’

Piers Master, partner and head of private wealth, added: ‘We have a high-profile private client team in the UK, and one of the strongest Middle East private capital practices of any international firm. While Amira’s arrival is a boost to our London team, where she will be based, given the growing demand for locally based legal advice in the Middle East, her ability to assist our teams there will be particularly valuable.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll