header-logo header-logo

30 October 2009 / Dorothea Gartland
Issue: 7391 / Categories: Features , Child law
printer mail-detail

Child law update

Dorothea Gartland analyses the concept of significant harm

The decision of the Court of Appeal in MA, SA, HA (Children by their Childrens’ Guardian) v MA, HA & The City and Council of Swansea [2009] EWCA Civ 853, [2009] All ER (D) 354 (Jul) will be of particular interest to practitioners in regard to the concept of significant harm under the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989).

As Ward LJ explains in his judgment: “This is, as I understand it, the first time this Court has had to consider when the dividing line between harm and significant harm is established.” The majority decision was to dismiss the appeal by the children’s guardian against the findings of the trial judge that the threshold had not been crossed in care proceedings and the subsequent dismissal of the care proceedings.

The facts

The parents were both from Pakistan and had arrived in the UK and sought asylum. Their claims had been refused.

While in the UK, the mother had three children and at the time of the appeal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll