header-logo header-logo

Child’s play (Pt 1)

28 April 2017 / David Burrows
Issue: 7743 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail
nlj_7743_burrows

In the first article in a series of three, David Burrows examines the role which a child can play in children proceedings

  • Can a child take, or participate in, proceedings which concern his or her future?
  • How can a child make his or her own application to the court in children proceedings?
  • What does the court take into consideration if the child’s ability to conduct proceedings is in question?

In Mabon v Mabon [2005] EWCA Civ 634, [2005] Fam 366, Wall LJ stressed the need to approach questions as to a child’s involvement in court proceedings from the ‘child’s perspective’ not that of the adults involved (eg judge, parties, legal representatives). This series of three articles:

  • considers the part children can play in English family proceedings;
  • contrasts their rights in EU law; and
  • looks at the way in which in any proceedings a child’s understanding of the issues involved in the case is material to the court’s decision.

This article considers what rights a child may have to participate in court children

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll