header-logo header-logo

Child’s play (Pt 1)

28 April 2017 / David Burrows
Issue: 7743 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail
nlj_7743_burrows

In the first article in a series of three, David Burrows examines the role which a child can play in children proceedings

  • Can a child take, or participate in, proceedings which concern his or her future?
  • How can a child make his or her own application to the court in children proceedings?
  • What does the court take into consideration if the child’s ability to conduct proceedings is in question?

In Mabon v Mabon [2005] EWCA Civ 634, [2005] Fam 366, Wall LJ stressed the need to approach questions as to a child’s involvement in court proceedings from the ‘child’s perspective’ not that of the adults involved (eg judge, parties, legal representatives). This series of three articles:

  • considers the part children can play in English family proceedings;
  • contrasts their rights in EU law; and
  • looks at the way in which in any proceedings a child’s understanding of the issues involved in the case is material to the court’s decision.

This article considers what rights a child may have to participate in court children

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll