header-logo header-logo

Child victims could be named

09 April 2014
Issue: 7602 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Charity condemns Lord Justice Leveson's ruling

Just for Kids Law has condemned a decision this week by Lord Justice Leveson to limit anonymity protections for children in court. 

The charity says it could deter child victims and witnesses, and impede rehabilitation for young offenders. 

Leveson LJ held, in JC, RT v CPS and BBC [2014] EWHC 1041 (QB) that children previously involved in court proceedings can be named in the media after they turn 18. He called on Parliament to “fashion a solution…as a matter of real urgency”. 

He said: “It is truly remarkable that Parliament was prepared to make provision for lifetime protection available to adult witnesses...but not to extend that protection to those under 18 once they had reached the age of majority, even if the same qualifying conditions were satisfied.”

The charity’s director, Shauneen Lambe, described the decision as “damaging and concerning”.

Following the ruling, children will have less protection than vulnerable adults, who are given anonymity for life under the Youth Justice & Criminal Evidence Act 1999, she said.

“The difficulties of encouraging child victims and witnesses to come forward are well recognised, as has been reported by the NSPCC report into the Jimmy Saville scandal. 

“The BBC’s own Child Protection Policy says that children’s best interests are at the heart of everything that they do, but I am not sure children would agree. For a child, knowing that they could be named in the world’s press once they turn 18 could be a real deterrent to their coming forward.” 

 

Issue: 7602 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll