header-logo header-logo

13 January 2011
Issue: 7448 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Children asylum seekers detention unlawful

The detention of children in Yarl’s Wood immigration centre was unlawful, the High Court has ruled.

Mr Justice Wyn Williams ruled this week that two asylum-seeker families from Malaysia and Nigeria were detained unlawfully at the centre, in Suppiah & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2 (Admin).

In a judgment that was critical of the UK Border Agency’s approach, Williams J held that both the decision to detain and the failure to release at an earlier stage breached the claimants’ rights under Arts 5 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
He clarified that the detention of families with children should occur only in “exceptional circumstances”.

Both families were snatched in dawn raids and the children, aged between one and 11 years old, became sick with diarrhoea and vomiting.

Phil Shiner of Public Interest Lawyers, who represented the claimants, says: “These women have courageously fought on behalf of all those who have suffered unnecessary and damaging detention due to the ‘tick-box’ manner in which UKBA has been allowed, until now, to lock families up.”

Issue: 7448 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll