header-logo header-logo

Children asylum seekers detention unlawful

13 January 2011
Issue: 7448 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The detention of children in Yarl’s Wood immigration centre was unlawful, the High Court has ruled.

Mr Justice Wyn Williams ruled this week that two asylum-seeker families from Malaysia and Nigeria were detained unlawfully at the centre, in Suppiah & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2 (Admin).

In a judgment that was critical of the UK Border Agency’s approach, Williams J held that both the decision to detain and the failure to release at an earlier stage breached the claimants’ rights under Arts 5 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
He clarified that the detention of families with children should occur only in “exceptional circumstances”.

Both families were snatched in dawn raids and the children, aged between one and 11 years old, became sick with diarrhoea and vomiting.

Phil Shiner of Public Interest Lawyers, who represented the claimants, says: “These women have courageously fought on behalf of all those who have suffered unnecessary and damaging detention due to the ‘tick-box’ manner in which UKBA has been allowed, until now, to lock families up.”

Issue: 7448 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll