header-logo header-logo

02 April 2025
Issue: 8111 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Local authority , Community care , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Children at risk of deprivation of liberty

Local authorities are increasingly using ‘deprivation of liberty’ orders to house troubled children in unregistered accommodation often many miles from home, the Law Society has warned.

Ministry of Justice figures published last week show 1,280 High Court ‘deprivation of liberty’ applications were made for children in 2024. 132 were for children aged 12 years and under, 734 were for children aged 13-15, and 414 were aged 16-18 years.

The Law Society highlighted that a lack of secure children’s home places meant unregistered accommodation was often used for children, and that families are not automatically eligible for legal aid.

Urging the government to make legal aid available, Richard Atkinson, president of the Law Society, said: ‘These are distressing cases with children who may have faced trauma and/or have physical and mental disabilities.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll