header-logo header-logo

31 July 2008 / Patrick Harrington KC , Gerard Forlin
Issue: 7332 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Child's play

The Court of Appeal has refined the test of the meaning of risk, say Patrick Harrington QC and Gerard Forlin

R v Porter [2008] EWCA Crim 1271is is an important appeal decision reviewing the current legal test of “risk” under the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 (HSWA 1974). In essence, it states that there needs to be a real, as opposed to theoretical or fanciful, risk and whether the existence of a previous similar accident can be a relevant factor.

James Porter is the headmaster of Hillgrove School in North Wales. He has run the school since 1975; it is a very successful school currently educating children from the age of three plus to 16. Mr Porter is utterly dedicated to the pupils at the school; his first priority is their welfare; he is totally committed to their wellbeing. The school itself was not purpose built; it was initially a private house at the beginning of the 20th century and became a preparatory school in the 1930s.

The school has

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll