header-logo header-logo

21 May 2009 / Robert Weir KC
Issue: 7370 / Categories: Features , Child law , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Child's play

Robert Weir on how common sense prevailed after a playground incident

* * * * * *

In Orchard v Lee [2009] EWCA 295 Mrs Orchard was working as a lunchtime assistant supervisor at a school. She was with another supervisor and walking outside in an area where the children regularly ran around playing. The defendant was one such 13-year-old boy. He was playing tag with another 13-year-old boy. He could see Orchard and adjusted his course as he ran away from the other boy. He then turned around to taunt his friend while still running, only now backwards. He collided with the claimant.

The claim

Orchard framed her claim against the defendant in negligence. As Orchard was not a participant in the game of tag, no issue of consent was raised. There did not appear to be any issue over the fact that the defendant owed the adult supervisor a duty of care. The case focused on whether the admitted duty of care had been breached.

The lead judgment in the Court

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll