header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

A Chinese takeaway (Pt 4)

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
05 August 2016 / Tim Malloch
Issue: 7711 / Categories: Features , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail
nlj_7696_malloch_1

Why have the dynamics of the Hinkley Point C negotiation changed since the EU referendum, asks Tim Malloch
    • Unless and until the UK specifically rules out joining the EEA as part of the Brexit process it would be prudent to assume that the existing EU rules on state aid will continue to apply to the UK. Accordingly, Brexit does not mean saying auf wiedersehen to the Austrian state aid challenge to HPC or indeed to similar state aid challenges to any future nuclear projects in the UK.

    Before the EU referendum result, the UK government appeared to be driving the pace of the Hinkley Point C (HPC) negotiations. At the Energy and Climate Change Select Committee (the ECCSC) hearing on 24 May 2016 Andrea Leadsom, then a Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) energy minister, stated that the UK government wanted EDF to take a final investment decision as soon as possible (see Question 211 Oral evidence: UK New Nuclear: Status Update, HC 176, 24 May 2016).

    Following

    If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
    If you are already a subscriber sign in
    ...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    Read All
    Sponsored by
    DWF—19 appointments

    DWF—19 appointments

    Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

    Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

    Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

    Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

    Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

    Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

    Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

    NEWS
    Read All
    NLJ this week: Fraud claims climb as courts brace for AI threats
    Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
    NLJ this week: Pro bono power without the red tape
    Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
    NLJ this week: Traders’ convictions quashed in Libor shock
    The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
    NLJ this week: Small firms call for tech clarity as AI looms
    Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
    NLJ this week: Trans pool player loses discrimination fight
    Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
    Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
    back-to-top-scroll