header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

The choice is yours

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
16 April 2015 / Steve Hynes
Issue: 7649 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Legal services
printer mail-detail
nlj_24_04_15_comment_hynes

Steve Hynes examines the policies political parties are offering the electorate on access to justice & legal aid

Through a combination of scope and fee cuts around £600m-£700m has been cut by the coalition government from the legal aid budget over this parliament. These cuts mean around 650,000 have been denied access to justice. The Conservatives seem committed to more cuts and former legal aid lawyer Sadiq Khan, the Labour Shadow Lord Chancellor, has made it clear that if they form the next government he will not be able to turn back the clock on all the changes to legal aid. Against this background the outlook does not appear optimistic for legal aid lawyers, the not-for-profit advice sector and the clients they serve, but there are some glimmers of light in the manifestos and other pronouncements from the politicians as they make their pitch to voters.

Dividing line

A clear dividing line between the two main political parties is the issue of the tenders for duty contracts for police and magistrates’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Law Society calls for clarity on AML
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: Turning corporate liability into opportunity
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
NLJ this week: A prince no more?
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
NLJ this week: Shareholder secrecy sunk
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
NLJ this week: The expanding remit of national security law
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll