header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
16 April 2015 / Steve Hynes
Issue: 7649 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Legal services
printer mail-detail

The choice is yours

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_24_04_15_comment_hynes

Steve Hynes examines the policies political parties are offering the electorate on access to justice & legal aid

Through a combination of scope and fee cuts around £600m-£700m has been cut by the coalition government from the legal aid budget over this parliament. These cuts mean around 650,000 have been denied access to justice. The Conservatives seem committed to more cuts and former legal aid lawyer Sadiq Khan, the Labour Shadow Lord Chancellor, has made it clear that if they form the next government he will not be able to turn back the clock on all the changes to legal aid. Against this background the outlook does not appear optimistic for legal aid lawyers, the not-for-profit advice sector and the clients they serve, but there are some glimmers of light in the manifestos and other pronouncements from the politicians as they make their pitch to voters.

Dividing line

A clear dividing line between the two main political parties is the issue of the tenders for duty contracts for police and magistrates’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Speechlive LogoClick to know more
Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Employment law’s four-point check
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
NLJ this week: Privacy meets the courtroom
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
NLJ this week: Auditors tighten the disclosure screws
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
NLJ this week: Telecoms tenants caught in a legal gap
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
NLJ this week: Due process holds the line

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll