header-logo header-logo

11 October 2007 / Simon Johnson
Issue: 7292 / Categories: Features , EU
printer mail-detail

Choose your law

Will choice of law agreements become popular under
Rome II? Simon Johnson investigates

The Rome II Regulation 864/2007/EC was published on 20 August 2007 and will come into force in January 2009. It applies to situations involving a conflict of laws in respect of non-contractual obligations in civil and commercial matters. It does not apply to revenue, customs or administrative matters or to the liability of the state for acts and omissions in the exercise of state authority (Art 1(1)).

Article 1(2) lists seven categories of non-contractual obligations excluded from the scope of Rome II: non-contractual obligations arising out of family relationships; matrimonial property regimes; wills and succession; bills of exchange; promissory notes and other negotiable instruments; the law of companies; trusts; nuclear damage; and defamation. It does not apply to evidence and procedure (Art 1(3)).

NON-CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

Rome II applies to damage arising as a consequence of tort or delict, unjust enrichment, negotiorum gestio (agency without authority) and culpa in contrahendo (pre-contractual situations). It will apply whether or not the obligations in question

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll