header-logo header-logo

11 October 2007 / Simon Johnson
Issue: 7292 / Categories: Features , EU
printer mail-detail

Choose your law

Will choice of law agreements become popular under
Rome II? Simon Johnson investigates

The Rome II Regulation 864/2007/EC was published on 20 August 2007 and will come into force in January 2009. It applies to situations involving a conflict of laws in respect of non-contractual obligations in civil and commercial matters. It does not apply to revenue, customs or administrative matters or to the liability of the state for acts and omissions in the exercise of state authority (Art 1(1)).

Article 1(2) lists seven categories of non-contractual obligations excluded from the scope of Rome II: non-contractual obligations arising out of family relationships; matrimonial property regimes; wills and succession; bills of exchange; promissory notes and other negotiable instruments; the law of companies; trusts; nuclear damage; and defamation. It does not apply to evidence and procedure (Art 1(3)).

NON-CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

Rome II applies to damage arising as a consequence of tort or delict, unjust enrichment, negotiorum gestio (agency without authority) and culpa in contrahendo (pre-contractual situations). It will apply whether or not the obligations in question

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll