header-logo header-logo

Civil judicial co-operation post Brexit

01 September 2017
Issue: 7759 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Family and civil lawyers have welcomed government calls for a cross-border civil judicial co-operation framework post Brexit

Under current reciprocal arrangements, a decision made by a court in the UK can be enforced in other EU Member States, enabling citizens to enforce orders made by the civil and family courts on commerce, trade and family matters such as child custody and maintenance.

After Brexit, the UK will no longer be part of this arrangement with EU Member States. Lawyers had warned of the uncertainties that families and businesses with international links might face.

However, the government said last week that it will ‘seek to agree new close and comprehensive arrangements for civil judicial cooperation with the EU,’ in its position paper, Providing a cross-border civil judicial cooperation framework.

Andrew Langdon QC, Chair of the Bar Council, said the position paper ‘shows that the government has been in listening mode when talking to the Bar Council and others on this crucial topic... However, the devil will be in the detail’.

Daniel Eames, chair of family lawyers group Resolution’s International Committee, said: ‘Cross border family law for intra EU-UK cases—whether divorce, children or financial—requires reciprocity.

‘Without reciprocal rules, there can be no legal certainty in treatment with all the ensuing complications, delays and potential costs for families and children or local authorities undertaking their child protection function.’

Ed Crosse, partner, Simmons & Simmons, said the paper confirms the UK government’s commitment to re-sign the 2005 Convention on Choice of Court Agreements. ‘As so many commercial agreements contain exclusive jurisdiction clauses, this is an important statement from the UK government, which should provide comfort to commercial parties,’ he said.

Issue: 7759 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll