header-logo header-logo

Civil litigation costs review

14 May 2009 / Amanda Wadey
Issue: 7369 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Amanda Wadey reports on Lord Justice Jackson's root & branch review

In November 2008, Sir Anthony Clarke, Master of the Rolls, commissioned Lord Justice Jackson to undertake a comprehensive review of the costs of civil litigation. At a press conference held last Friday, and attended by the Master of the Rolls, Sir Rupert presented his initial report summarising the results of the first phase of the review process.

Scope of the report

The issue of costs is a complex and far-reaching one, so much so that this review must by necessity be a root and branch exercise. The terms of reference of this report bear this out: “whether changes in process and/or procedure could bring about more proportionate costs.” Considering the breadth of issues to be covered the time period by which Jackson LJ must conclude the report is admirable in its brevity:

      
      ●     January to April: Phase 1—fact finding.

      
      ●     May to July: Phase 2—consultation.

      
      ●     September to December: Phase 3—preparation of the final report.

Conclusion

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll