header-logo header-logo

Civil litigation costs review

14 May 2009 / Amanda Wadey
Issue: 7369 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Amanda Wadey reports on Lord Justice Jackson's root & branch review

In November 2008, Sir Anthony Clarke, Master of the Rolls, commissioned Lord Justice Jackson to undertake a comprehensive review of the costs of civil litigation. At a press conference held last Friday, and attended by the Master of the Rolls, Sir Rupert presented his initial report summarising the results of the first phase of the review process.

Scope of the report

The issue of costs is a complex and far-reaching one, so much so that this review must by necessity be a root and branch exercise. The terms of reference of this report bear this out: “whether changes in process and/or procedure could bring about more proportionate costs.” Considering the breadth of issues to be covered the time period by which Jackson LJ must conclude the report is admirable in its brevity:

      
      ●     January to April: Phase 1—fact finding.

      
      ●     May to July: Phase 2—consultation.

      
      ●     September to December: Phase 3—preparation of the final report.

Conclusion of Phase

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll