header-logo header-logo

A civil question...

22 November 2013 / Lucy McCormick
Issue: 7585 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
web_mccormick

Lucy McCormick outlines some ground rules for dealing with vulnerable witnesses in civil cases

This summer, Justice Minister Damian Green launched a review of aggressive courtroom cross-examination of vulnerable witnesses. This followed a plethora of news stories about the treatment of victims in the trial of the Telford child prostitution gang and the suicide of Frances Andrade following her testimony in the Michael Brewer case. The NSPCC have been quick to take up the cause, warning recently that the courts are failing child witnesses. It is fair to say that the treatment of vulnerable witnesses has never had a higher profile.

Criminal lawyers certainly have a difficult job in these sensitive cases. However, at least they are the subject of clear and accessible guidance: there is legislation in the form of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 (YJCEA 1999), topped up by various CPS guidelines. The position for civil lawyers is much murkier.

This is unfortunate. Just as in criminal trials, civil cases do sometimes require evidence from children, individuals with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll