header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
22 November 2013 / Lucy McCormick
Issue: 7585 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

A civil question...

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
web_mccormick

Lucy McCormick outlines some ground rules for dealing with vulnerable witnesses in civil cases

This summer, Justice Minister Damian Green launched a review of aggressive courtroom cross-examination of vulnerable witnesses. This followed a plethora of news stories about the treatment of victims in the trial of the Telford child prostitution gang and the suicide of Frances Andrade following her testimony in the Michael Brewer case. The NSPCC have been quick to take up the cause, warning recently that the courts are failing child witnesses. It is fair to say that the treatment of vulnerable witnesses has never had a higher profile.

Criminal lawyers certainly have a difficult job in these sensitive cases. However, at least they are the subject of clear and accessible guidance: there is legislation in the form of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 (YJCEA 1999), topped up by various CPS guidelines. The position for civil lawyers is much murkier.

This is unfortunate. Just as in criminal trials, civil cases do sometimes require evidence from children, individuals with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll