header-logo header-logo

22 November 2013 / Lucy McCormick
Issue: 7585 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

A civil question...

web_mccormick

Lucy McCormick outlines some ground rules for dealing with vulnerable witnesses in civil cases

This summer, Justice Minister Damian Green launched a review of aggressive courtroom cross-examination of vulnerable witnesses. This followed a plethora of news stories about the treatment of victims in the trial of the Telford child prostitution gang and the suicide of Frances Andrade following her testimony in the Michael Brewer case. The NSPCC have been quick to take up the cause, warning recently that the courts are failing child witnesses. It is fair to say that the treatment of vulnerable witnesses has never had a higher profile.

Criminal lawyers certainly have a difficult job in these sensitive cases. However, at least they are the subject of clear and accessible guidance: there is legislation in the form of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 (YJCEA 1999), topped up by various CPS guidelines. The position for civil lawyers is much murkier.

This is unfortunate. Just as in criminal trials, civil cases do sometimes require evidence from children, individuals with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll