header-logo header-logo

22 November 2013 / Lucy McCormick
Issue: 7585 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

A civil question...

web_mccormick

Lucy McCormick outlines some ground rules for dealing with vulnerable witnesses in civil cases

This summer, Justice Minister Damian Green launched a review of aggressive courtroom cross-examination of vulnerable witnesses. This followed a plethora of news stories about the treatment of victims in the trial of the Telford child prostitution gang and the suicide of Frances Andrade following her testimony in the Michael Brewer case. The NSPCC have been quick to take up the cause, warning recently that the courts are failing child witnesses. It is fair to say that the treatment of vulnerable witnesses has never had a higher profile.

Criminal lawyers certainly have a difficult job in these sensitive cases. However, at least they are the subject of clear and accessible guidance: there is legislation in the form of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 (YJCEA 1999), topped up by various CPS guidelines. The position for civil lawyers is much murkier.

This is unfortunate. Just as in criminal trials, civil cases do sometimes require evidence from children, individuals with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll