header-logo header-logo

A civil question...

22 November 2013 / Lucy McCormick
Issue: 7585 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
web_mccormick

Lucy McCormick outlines some ground rules for dealing with vulnerable witnesses in civil cases

This summer, Justice Minister Damian Green launched a review of aggressive courtroom cross-examination of vulnerable witnesses. This followed a plethora of news stories about the treatment of victims in the trial of the Telford child prostitution gang and the suicide of Frances Andrade following her testimony in the Michael Brewer case. The NSPCC have been quick to take up the cause, warning recently that the courts are failing child witnesses. It is fair to say that the treatment of vulnerable witnesses has never had a higher profile.

Criminal lawyers certainly have a difficult job in these sensitive cases. However, at least they are the subject of clear and accessible guidance: there is legislation in the form of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 (YJCEA 1999), topped up by various CPS guidelines. The position for civil lawyers is much murkier.

This is unfortunate. Just as in criminal trials, civil cases do sometimes require evidence from children, individuals with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll