header-logo header-logo

02 August 2024 / Steve Foster
Issue: 8082 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Civil servants & the law: when laws collide

184281
Steve Foster examines the duty of civil servants to obey the law—but which one?
  • The Civil Service Code requires civil servants to comply with the law—but in certain circumstances, such as implementing a minister’s decision to remove a migrant to Rwanda, this duty is not clear cut.
  • This article examines recent decisions that shed light on our legal system and constitution, and their relationship with international law and accepted principles of constitutionalism.

What happens if a civil servant is asked to perform an Act, but that Act is inconsistent with international law and the decision of an international court? The answer might lie in the civil servant’s contract, but if that says that they must comply with ‘the law’, then we are no further ahead. Alternatively, we might need to look at our constitutional system, asking whether a minister has the legal power to issue the order, and what happens when that legal power is inconsistent with international law.

A recent decision of the High Court (R

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll