header-logo header-logo

Civil servants & the law: when laws collide

02 August 2024 / Steve Foster
Issue: 8082 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
184281
Steve Foster examines the duty of civil servants to obey the law—but which one?
  • The Civil Service Code requires civil servants to comply with the law—but in certain circumstances, such as implementing a minister’s decision to remove a migrant to Rwanda, this duty is not clear cut.
  • This article examines recent decisions that shed light on our legal system and constitution, and their relationship with international law and accepted principles of constitutionalism.

What happens if a civil servant is asked to perform an Act, but that Act is inconsistent with international law and the decision of an international court? The answer might lie in the civil servant’s contract, but if that says that they must comply with ‘the law’, then we are no further ahead. Alternatively, we might need to look at our constitutional system, asking whether a minister has the legal power to issue the order, and what happens when that legal power is inconsistent with international law.

A recent decision of the High Court (R (on

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll