header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 3 April 2015

02 April 2015
Issue: 7647 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Employment tribunal limits up; Latest credit hire ruling; Pleading diarrhoea; New CoP rules & CPR latest update

ON—AND OFF—THE JOB

The annual RPI tweak of employment tribunal award limits will impact on post-5 April 2015 axings where the employee can afford to make a claim. As employment tribunal judges and their deputies contemplate taking their knitting to work with a circa 80% drop in business and the renaming of their bases to unemployment tribunals, the Employment Rights (Increase of Limits) Order 2015 (SI 2015/226) raises the limits by 2.3%. For the unfair dismissal compensatory award, for example, this means a new ceiling of £78,335 and the cuddly one week’s pay panning out at £475. And for employment anoraks, the Employment Tribunals and the Employment Appeal Tribunals Fees (Amendment) Order 2015 (SI 2015/414) which swept into force on 25 March 2015 clarifies that an employer’s contract counterclaim fee is to be charged as a type A and not a type B.

The ACAS code of practice on disciplinary procedures has been revised as from 11 March

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll