header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 9 October 2015

09 October 2015 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7671 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Consumer law: back to school; assured shortholds: s 21 notice prescribed; £5K for bankruptcy.

CONSUMERS ALRIGHT ACT: FIRST DOLLOP

“Oh no. The Sale of Goods Act—1677 wasn’t it? That’s about all I know. I learnt it at law school. They can’t take it away from me now.”

Steady on. It was 1893 actually and then there was the Sale of Goods Act 1979 (SGA 1979). What’s happened is that the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA 2015)—its meat came into force on 1 October 2015 by dint of commencement order SI 2015/1630 and catches contracts made on or after that date—replaces for consumer contracts only the SGA 1979 (well, most of it), the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (UCTA 1977), the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 (SI 1999/2083) (UCTAR), the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 and the Sale and Supply of Goods to Consumers Regulations 2002 (SI 2002/3045). To be precise, the replacement is for a contract made between a trader (a person acting for purposes relating to their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll