header-logo header-logo

09 October 2015 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7671 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 9 October 2015

Consumer law: back to school; assured shortholds: s 21 notice prescribed; £5K for bankruptcy.

CONSUMERS ALRIGHT ACT: FIRST DOLLOP

“Oh no. The Sale of Goods Act—1677 wasn’t it? That’s about all I know. I learnt it at law school. They can’t take it away from me now.”

Steady on. It was 1893 actually and then there was the Sale of Goods Act 1979 (SGA 1979). What’s happened is that the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA 2015)—its meat came into force on 1 October 2015 by dint of commencement order SI 2015/1630 and catches contracts made on or after that date—replaces for consumer contracts only the SGA 1979 (well, most of it), the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (UCTA 1977), the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 (SI 1999/2083) (UCTAR), the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 and the Sale and Supply of Goods to Consumers Regulations 2002 (SI 2002/3045). To be precise, the replacement is for a contract made between a trader (a person acting for purposes relating to their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll