header-logo header-logo

09 October 2015 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7671 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 9 October 2015

Consumer law: back to school; assured shortholds: s 21 notice prescribed; £5K for bankruptcy.

CONSUMERS ALRIGHT ACT: FIRST DOLLOP

“Oh no. The Sale of Goods Act—1677 wasn’t it? That’s about all I know. I learnt it at law school. They can’t take it away from me now.”

Steady on. It was 1893 actually and then there was the Sale of Goods Act 1979 (SGA 1979). What’s happened is that the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA 2015)—its meat came into force on 1 October 2015 by dint of commencement order SI 2015/1630 and catches contracts made on or after that date—replaces for consumer contracts only the SGA 1979 (well, most of it), the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (UCTA 1977), the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 (SI 1999/2083) (UCTAR), the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 and the Sale and Supply of Goods to Consumers Regulations 2002 (SI 2002/3045). To be precise, the replacement is for a contract made between a trader (a person acting for purposes relating to their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll