header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 27 January 2017

27 January 2017
Issue: 7731 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

PI claims: keep out!; Master Kay’s room & How to lose a £43K deposit

RANT

It may be inappropriate but I fancy I can escape LexisNexis disciplinary action upon using the c word. So here goes. Compulsory insurance. Yes, the Motor Vehicles (Compulsory Insurance) Regulations 2016 (SI 2016/1193) which came into force on 31 December 2016 raise the amount of cover for motor insurance damage to property by £200,000 to £1.2m. Happily, most policies already cover for in excess of the new minimum figure. If any policy covers for less, then the insurer must now effect an increase.

No doubt the scripts are being extended for insurance staff who negotiate renewal premiums. “I’m afraid retired judiciary are regarded as a bad risk, Steve, and we’ve got these new regs which means higher property damage cover.” Steve won’t let them get away with it. The government consulted on raising the limit and were told by the industry that few £1m property damage claims were made and that they did not think the increase would lead

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll