header-logo header-logo

24 March 2017
Issue: 7739 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 24 March 2017

New challenge for lease costs; Saturday, Bloody Saturday; sniffing out a judicial interview & the magic of land registry address.

ADMIN ATTACK

It’s all very well for a tenant to engage in litigation with their landlord but they could be clobbered for some or all of the landlord’s costs thanks to a lease covenant. The tenant may apply under s 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 for an order restricting the landlord from adding costs to the service charge. The tenant could be off the hook for their service charge percentage of the whole or part of the costs. In fact, all tenants could escape liability and an individual tenant might even apply under s 20C to be relieved of bearing their proportion of costs incurred in litigation between landlord and a co-tenant.

The tenant in the recent Bretby Hall Management Co Ltd v Pratt [2017] UKUT 0070 (LC)—gloriously involving 90 disputed items including window cleaning and gardening—applied for a s 20C order to the upper tribunal (lands chamber) which had allowed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll