header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 24 March 2017

24 March 2017
Issue: 7739 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

New challenge for lease costs; Saturday, Bloody Saturday; sniffing out a judicial interview & the magic of land registry address.

ADMIN ATTACK

It’s all very well for a tenant to engage in litigation with their landlord but they could be clobbered for some or all of the landlord’s costs thanks to a lease covenant. The tenant may apply under s 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 for an order restricting the landlord from adding costs to the service charge. The tenant could be off the hook for their service charge percentage of the whole or part of the costs. In fact, all tenants could escape liability and an individual tenant might even apply under s 20C to be relieved of bearing their proportion of costs incurred in litigation between landlord and a co-tenant.

The tenant in the recent Bretby Hall Management Co Ltd v Pratt [2017] UKUT 0070 (LC)—gloriously involving 90 disputed items including window cleaning and gardening—applied for a s 20C order to the upper tribunal (lands chamber) which had allowed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll