header-logo header-logo

14 May 2021 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7932 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 14 May 2021

Late L&T notice change; appeal route in finance cases; case management disorder; on-road removal unlawful; summary judgment beats default.

NOTICE SURPRISE

The assured tenancy notice seeking possession in England in Form 3 has been amended as many times as the size of my jacket. The latest amendment is down to the Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (Moratorium Debt) (Consequential Amendment) (England) Regulations 2021, SI 2021/518, and, despite their worthiness, they will be unwelcome to landlords who have just served in blissful ignorance and prefer not to be kicked when they are down. The regulations came into force on 4 May 2021 (which was a meagre six days after they were made) and are devoted to the debt respite moratoria which apply as from the same date (see ‘Civil way’, 170 NLJ 7914, p16; NLJ 26 February 2021, p14) and have hardly been an overnight sensation. The amendment is by way of inclusion of new guidance that the form should not be served in relation to a moratorium

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll