header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 12 September 2008

11 September 2008
Issue: 7336 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Procedure & practice

Objections to a company's registered name (because it is the same as one in which the objector has goodwill or is so like such a name that it is likely to mislead) are to be determined under the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006), ss 69 and 70 which come into force on 1 October 2008.

The provisions are aimed at the opportunists who have in mind merger talks between New Law Journal and Penthouse and might otherwise be quick off the mark to register New Law Penthouse Ltd and possibly Civil Way Naked Ltd for good measure. Companies House will not deal with the opportunist but only with “too like” or “same as” registrations.

And so it is that the Company Names Adjudicator Rules 2008 (SI 2008/1738) come into force on the same date. The rules are modelled on the Registered Designs Rules 2008 and, indeed, members of the Registrar of Trade Marks Tribunal will be doubling as the first adjudicators on company names. They may make an order to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Set creates new client and business development role amid growth

Kingsley Napley—Tim Lowles

Kingsley Napley—Tim Lowles

Sports disputes practice launchedwith partner appointment

mfg Solicitors—Tom Evans

mfg Solicitors—Tom Evans

Tax and succession planning offering expands with returning partner

NEWS
The rank of King’s Counsel (KC) has been awarded to 96 barristers, and no solicitors, in the latest silk round
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
back-to-top-scroll