header-logo header-logo

05 July 2018
Issue: 7800 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 6 July 2018

MoJ payback; orders! Orders!; credit mire; silently unmeritorious.

FEES OVERCHARGE

The County Court has been overcharging on the issue of certain CPR Pt 8 stage 3 protocol low-value personal injury road traffic and employers’ and public liability claims, extracting the sweep-up ‘any other remedy’ fee of £308 instead of the usually lower money claim fee where, for example, a paper form claim within the £3,000 to £5,000 range would cost £103 less. Staff have been given revised guidance and the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) informs us that it will be setting out details of a refund scheme in due course. Catering for cases where the inflated fee has been settled by the unsuccessful party should present a nice headache.

A reminder to court staff on the issue of the revised MoJ guidance will not go amiss along with a certificate of value to be added to the Pt 8 claim form corresponding to the relevant fee band. And a reminder to you, dear readers, that where you have procured a limitation stay of a claim

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll