header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
01 November 2018
Issue: 7815 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 2 November 2018

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Carry on testing; lawyer bypass regrets; better reception likely.

Assault in Petty France

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) is beating itself up. As its online divorce project progresses, its consultation is taking place on abandoning any degree of fault as a basis for obtaining a divorce. The irony is that if the MoJ was thoroughly sick of itself it would have a prima facie case of unreasonable behaviour against the MoJ.

As to the project, the target is to extend the online service, which is currently being tested with a small group of family solicitors, to make it more widely available to the profession by the end of this year. Facilities for respondents to acknowledge service online and for petitioners to apply for a decree online should be available in early 2019 with full roll out by the end of next year. Expansion to cover civil partnerships and other matrimonial orders is some way off. The official line is that divorce reform, with the consultation running until 10 December 2018, may change the shape

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll