header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 2 November 2018

01 November 2018
Issue: 7815 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Carry on testing; lawyer bypass regrets; better reception likely.

Assault in Petty France

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) is beating itself up. As its online divorce project progresses, its consultation is taking place on abandoning any degree of fault as a basis for obtaining a divorce. The irony is that if the MoJ was thoroughly sick of itself it would have a prima facie case of unreasonable behaviour against the MoJ.

As to the project, the target is to extend the online service, which is currently being tested with a small group of family solicitors, to make it more widely available to the profession by the end of this year. Facilities for respondents to acknowledge service online and for petitioners to apply for a decree online should be available in early 2019 with full roll out by the end of next year. Expansion to cover civil partnerships and other matrimonial orders is some way off. The official line is that divorce reform, with the consultation running until 10 December 2018, may change the shape

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll