header-logo header-logo

19 June 2026 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 8166 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 19 June 2026

Insolvency in London; Special account more special; Data complaints; Pipeline legislation; Warring with bankrupt’s trustees.

LAWBITES

Verbiage wind-up More insolvency work for the county court. Where proceedings are allocated to the London Insolvency District (under SI 2016/1024 as amended, r 10.11(1)), the creditor is now to present their petition to the High Court only where the debt is for at least £500,000 in lieu of £50,000: otherwise, the county court at Central London wins. Insolvency amendment rules SI 2026/561, in force on 22 June 2026, raise the limit. They also play around with the principal rules ‘providing certainty for users and stakeholders’. ‘Registrar’ is formally dumped. They’re judges, for heaven’s sake. Just one copy of a document is to be delivered where sent electronically.

Special account: keep out Investment in the Court Fund’s Office’s special account is to be limited to funds for children and persons who lack capacity. That is now made clear by amendment rules SI 2026/593 which come into force on 29 June 2026. The special account generates

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll