header-logo header-logo

01 October 2020
Issue: 7904 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil Way: 2 October 2020

Winding down; Taxman to retake priority; Possessions: very latest; Mauve is in

LAWBITES

* An extension from 30 September 2020 to 31 December 2020 of winding up petition restrictions is among the measures provided for by the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 (Coronavirus) (Extension of the Relevant Period) Regulations 2020 (SI 2020/1031). Further regulations (SI 2020/1033) bring certain temporary moratoria provisions to a summary end on 01 October 2020.

* The Insolvency Act 1986 (HMRC Debts: Priority on Insolvency) Regulations 2020 (SI 2020/983) restore to HMRC some respectability in individual and corporate insolvencies in the UK as from 1 December 2020—and some cash. The loss of the crown preference in 2003 has led to HMRC writing off around £3.5bn per annum. Under the regulations it will rank as a secondary preferential creditor, below fixed chargees but above unsecured creditors and floating chargees, for tax deducted under PAYE and the construction industry schemes, employee national insurance contributions and student loans. The Finance Act 2020 gave it the same ranking for VAT.

* Home

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll