header-logo header-logo

19 September 2019
Issue: 7856 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 20 September 2019

Vet a good bet; ENE to take off; latest CPR updates; FDR judge out for good

SAFER ON THE FARM

Train as a vet if you plan to get up to any professional mischief. As of 25 November 2019, the only professional regulator in England and Wales applying the criminal standard of proof to professional misconduct proceedings will be the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons. Yes, that’s the date on which the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal goes civil by ending or suspending your career if satisfied on first instance hearings that it is more probable than not—rather than beyond reasonable doubt—that you groped or plundered. The Solicitors (Disciplinary Proceedings) Rules 2019 (SI 2019/1185) (replacing the 2007 rules) does the evidential trick for hearings which arise out of applications or complaints made on or after 25 November 2019. The tribunal already applies the civil standard to appeals against written rebukes and directions to pay penalties of less than £2,000 imposed by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. A PD in respect of the application procedure for agreed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll