header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
17 July 2009 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7378 / Categories: Features , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 17 July 2009

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Ritzy fees

Civil and family court fees went up—again—on 13 July 2009. The Civil Proceedings Fees (Amendment) Order 2009 (SI2009/1498) and Family Proceedings Fees (Amendment) Order 2009 (SI2009/1499) are to blame with considerable help from the Ministry of Justice and Treasury. By way of example, a claimant not entitled to fee remission who has to endure a defended hearing to obtain judgment for £100 and who puts in the bailiff, will now shell out a cool £155 on court fees alone (ignoring an on-line or bulk centre discount).

Enforcement ouch

Enforcement takes the biggest hit. In civil and family cases a warrant of execution, charging order (oh so popular), third party debt order (still a garnishee in family parlance) or application for an attachment of earnings order will attract a fee of £100 each (and more than one form of enforcement may be concurrently pursued). This is a whopping increase of generally around double (except for High Court civil).The warrant of execution fee (albeit a reduced £70 for bulk issue cases) replaces

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
NLJ this week: Diamond rings and broken promises

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: The battle over medical report fees intensifies
Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll