header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Civil way: 17 July 2009

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
17 July 2009 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7378 / Categories: Features , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Ritzy fees

Civil and family court fees went up—again—on 13 July 2009. The Civil Proceedings Fees (Amendment) Order 2009 (SI2009/1498) and Family Proceedings Fees (Amendment) Order 2009 (SI2009/1499) are to blame with considerable help from the Ministry of Justice and Treasury. By way of example, a claimant not entitled to fee remission who has to endure a defended hearing to obtain judgment for £100 and who puts in the bailiff, will now shell out a cool £155 on court fees alone (ignoring an on-line or bulk centre discount).

Enforcement ouch

Enforcement takes the biggest hit. In civil and family cases a warrant of execution, charging order (oh so popular), third party debt order (still a garnishee in family parlance) or application for an attachment of earnings order will attract a fee of £100 each (and more than one form of enforcement may be concurrently pursued). This is a whopping increase of generally around double (except for High Court civil).The warrant of execution fee (albeit a reduced £70 for bulk issue cases) replaces

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Traders’ convictions quashed in Libor shock
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
NLJ this week: Pro bono power without the red tape
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: DNA evidence—justice on ice?
In this week's NLJ, Steven Ball of Red Lion Chambers unpacks how advances in forensic science finally unmasked Ryland Headley, jailed in 2025 for the 1967 rape and murder of 75-year-old Louisa Dunne. Preserved swabs and palm prints lay dormant for decades until DNA-17 profiling produced a billion-to-one match
NLJ this week: Small firms call for tech clarity as AI looms
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Fraud claims climb as courts brace for AI threats
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll