header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
08 November 2007 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7296 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 9 November 2007

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Redress against estate agents >>
Christmas court closures >>
Satisfaction of an expensive motor >>
Shared residency accommodates >>
Pleading industrial accidents >>

 SOME OF MY BEST FRIENDS ARE ESTATE AGENTS BUT...

Persons engaged in residential estate agency work—not their employees—are to be required to belong to an approved redress scheme once provisions of the limp Consumers, Estate Agents and Redress Act 2007 are on the market in early 2008. The Act’s first commencement order SI 2007/2934 brought s 53(1) and Sch 6 into force on 8 October 2007 and will enable approval to be given to redress schemes.

If you harbour a deep grudge towards estate agents and are out for revenge then you must get your approval application in by the end of today (9 November). Unfortunately, you will have to provide biological details of the scheme’s senior officers and its ombudsman and of any unspent criminal convictions against them so better cancel lunch.

The criteria on selection will be the range of available scheme awards—be original and include an

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
NLJ this week: Diamond rings and broken promises

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: The battle over medical report fees intensifies
Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll