header-logo header-logo

16 August 2007
Issue: 7286 / Categories: Features , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 17 August 2007

a silver jubilee (2)

Special procedure divorces

In 1984, “Litigation” (the former title of this column) rediscovered the Queen’s Proctor was still alive when Sir John Arnold, President of the Family Division, rescinded three decrees nisi based on unreasonable behaviour in favour of petitioners who had sworn special procedure affidavits falsely deposing that they and their spouses were not living together.

Queen’s Proctor Still Snooping—Official

Who referred...the cases to the court? Why, our old friend the Queen’s Proctor—back from those balmy days of collusion and discretion statements. The QP currently investigates about 100 cases a year through two Treasury Solicitor lawyers. Nosey neighbours still do their stuff (the practice of some local newspapers in listing decrees pronounced has made this a more active source of information) and petitioners who have secured a decree on the strength of their special procedure affidavit can find on the children’s appointment that the judge discovers more than they had bargained for and directs the papers to be sent to the QP.

And any citizen with a social conscience

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll