header-logo header-logo

06 May 2022 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7977 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 6 May 2022

Damages to eyesight; PI 6.56% uplift; Onward online for divorce; Wasted exclusion clause

ELECTROMANIA

More risk to your eyesight as legal representatives are mandated to issue online for damages only claims in the county court—and not just for personal injury—as from 4 April 2022 under CPR PD 51ZB. LiPs can wipe the smile off their faces: HMCTS will be after them eventually. A 14-day grace period, extended to 28 days, for practitioners who had respect for their health and issued on paper has expired. Ignoring the PD now will lead to paperwork being bounced back unissued where the sin is spotted or proceedings struck out when a procedural judge, awaiting an ophthalmic appointment for stronger lenses, picks up on non-compliance.

There could be a way out. Throwing in a prayer for an injunction to restrain the defendant from inflicting any further loss on the claimant would be both ingenious and hazardous. Expressly excluded, among others, are claims not conducted in English (which could catch quite a lot of statements of case

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll