header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 8 June 2012

07 June 2012
Issue: 7517 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

They have just become more readily available. The High Court and county courts are now empowered to make a charging order without any default under an instalment judgment...

CHARGING ON

They have just become more readily available. The High Court and county courts are now empowered to make a charging order without any default under an instalment judgment. That’s thanks to the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 (TCEA 2007), s 93 (amending the Charging Orders Act 1979) having been brought into force on 17 May 2012 by commencement order SI 2012/1312. This important change will not apply where the judgment or order was made or applied for before the operative date.

So ends the device of the judgment creditor unashamedly applying to vary an instalment judgment to a forthwith judgment, so as to procure a default and with it the platform to go for a charging order (even if it ended up with a final charging order but a direction effectively debarring an application for an order for sale, so long

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll