header-logo header-logo

22 March 2013
Issue: 7553 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Jackson
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 22 March 2013

The avalanche of Jackson legislation continues unabated...

JACKCHAT

The avalanche of Jackson legislation continues unabated. The Civil Procedure (Amendment No 2) Rules 2013 (SI 2013/515) amend the amended and facilitate the opt out of costs budgeting for plus £2m Chancery, Construction and Technology and Mercantile Court claims (see Civil way). They also fine-tune transitional measures by providing that costs incurred in respect of work done before 1 April 2013 will not be subject to the new standard basis proportionality test (proportionality trumping reasonableness) (see again Civil way).

A tiny 61st update has been issued which introduces a new PD51I covering a second six month mediation service pilot scheme for small claims as from 1 April 2013. The first pilot scheme brought to us by PD51H lapses (see Civil way). Free mediation will be available where both parties are willing to tango in claims up to £10,000 (apart from road traffic accident, personal injury and housing disrepair claims) issued not simply out of the CCMCC but issued out of the Production

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll