header-logo header-logo

10 May 2013
Issue: 7559 / Categories: Features , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 10 May 2013

Latest in Jacksonland, flexi tenants and the possibility of advance rent protection

JACKCHAT

And for now

New CPR 44.3(8) loves interim costs when the court orders detailed assessment. In Deutsche Bank v Khan and others [2013] EWHC 1020 (Comm), [2013] All ER (D) 205 (Apr) before Hamblin J the claimant receiving party asked for £2,743,000 which represented two thirds of what it was claiming discounted by 20%. The judge made an interim order for £2,100,000. Cool. The basis of assessment was ordered to be indemnity, the claimant relying on a facility agreement requiring an indemnity for “all costs”. It was held that this was equivalent to indemnity costs and that the clear weight of authority supported the proposition that such a provision meant the indemnity basis. The only authority to the contrary was Re Adelphi Hotel (Brighton) Ltd [1953] 1 WLR 8955 but Vaisey J there had not been followed in other cases.

Mediation conundrum

Mediation may be viewed as a little less attractive if it fails and the ultimate victor

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll