header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
27 June 2013
Issue: 7556 / Categories: Features , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 28 June 2013

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

The latest on Jackson

JACKCHAT

Gotcha!

If you thought you might escape paying an allocation fee on a plus £1,500 CPR Pt 7 claim on filing the new directions questionnaire (quite independently, of course, from your usual attempt at ducking the listing and hearing fees by drafting case management directions which provide for pre-trial checklists to be dispensed with) then think again. The Civil Proceedings Fees (Amendment) Order 2013 (SI 2013/734) which squeezed into force on 1 April 2013 having been made four days earlier (phew!) provides for the fee to be paid when an allocation or directions questionnaire is filed or when a case is allocated to track without a questionnaire. Another fees order is expected soon: court users are quaking.

Back door

Fixed costs in fast-track cases did not happen as Jackson LJ had envisaged and the amendment CPR unsurprisingly make no provision for fast-track costs management. How will proportionality be applied to fast tracks? Jackson LJ has suggested that the costs claimed by the fast-track receiving party might

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026—the winners!
The winners of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026 have now been announced, marking another outstanding celebration of excellence, innovation, and impact across the legal profession
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll