header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 4 October 2013

04 October 2013
Issue: 7578 / Categories: Features , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Fee remission pain from Monday, short bankruptcies over & in-house cheer

THE PARTY’S OVER

A taxi driver once subjected me to an account of the succession of small claims he brought in a certain county court each year which he timed to coincide with the regular prolonged summer break he took having “signed on”. By so doing, he procured remission of court fees. At journey end, the writer informed him of his involvement in the administration of civil justice whereupon he took off before the writer’s feet had touched the pavement and there had been an opportunity to tender a gratuity. You might say it was a gratuity remission situation.

As threatened (see “Civil way”), the annual £28m lost in fee income is coming to an end next Monday 7 October 2013 so skates are needed to beat the new system of remission which is introduced by the Courts and Tribunals Fee Remissions Order 2013 (SI 2013/2302) and will apply across the board—civil, family, magistrates’ courts, Court of Protection and non-contentious fees included

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll