header-logo header-logo

Claim form

04 July 2013
Issue: 7567 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Hills Contractors and Construction Ltd v Struth and another [2013] EWHC 1693 (TCC), [2013] All ER (D) 220 (Jun)

The effect of CPR 7.2 (1) and CPR 2.6(1) was that, as a general rule, a claim form was the document issued by the court on which the court seal was placed. Accordingly, when CPR 6.3(1) stated that “a claim form may…be served by any of the following methods”, as a general rule, it was service of a hard copy document as issued and sealed by the court. A photocopy of that document was not sufficient. There were clearly exceptions. When a claim form was served by fax or other means of electronic communication under CPR 6.3(1)(d) in accordance with Practice Direction 6A, necessarily there was not service of the original document issued and sealed by the court. In such circumstances, the hard or soft copy of the fax or the soft copy or print out of the attachment to an e-mail was the document served but in each case the hard or soft copy represented a copy

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women
A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
back-to-top-scroll